Newsletter>
Hot Story! Memo shows Bush lied about WMB

May 7, 2005

By Greg Szymanski 
 
An explosive memo sent to England’s Prime Minister and 
others by a former foreign policy aide clearly shows 
President Bush “doctored” intelligence reports prior to the 
Iraqi invasion in order to justify war based on weapons of 
mass destruction.  
 
The potentially damaging memo was leaked to the London 
press this week, revealing an internal memo sent on July 
23, 2002, by Matthew Rycroft, a former defense policy aide. 
Rycroft addressed his concerns about America’s deceptive 
“rush to war” to England’s heads of state, including the 
Prime Minister, Defense secretary, Foreign Secretary and 
Attorney General. 
 
Since the U.S. invaded Iraq based on an imminent threat of 
WMD, the Bush administration has stood firm on its decision 
to topple Sadaam Hussein, claiming it should not be now 
blamed for faulty intelligence reports. To date no weapons 
of mass destruction have ever been uncovered in Iraq and 
serious questions have been raised about America’s “rush to 
judgment” in attacking Iraq. 
 
The memo, which has been verified as “Secret and Personal – 
For UK Eyes Only,” clearly shows the Bush administration 
lied to the American people about its basis for going to 
war in Iraq. To date over 1,700 American troops have been 
killed in the fighting and estimates of over 100,000 
innocent Iraqi civilians have also perished. 
 
The London press claims to have verified the authenticity 
of the memo before publication, also blaming its own 
government for following America to war even though it had 
solid evidence no weapons of mass destruction existed in 
Iraq. 
 
Just prior to U.S. invasion, Rycroft, who was privy to 
highly classified U.S. intelligence reports, clearly 
reveals a deceptive strategy on the part of the Bush 
administration to topple Hussein when he wrote: 
 
“As reported in recent talks in Washington, there was a 
perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen 
as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Sadaam, through 
military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism 
and WMD.  
 
“But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the 
policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no 
enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's 
record. There was little discussion in Washington of the 
aftermath after military action.” 
 
Regarding the memo, the Bush administration refused comment 
saying it was unaware of the specific allegations. Critics 
claim this memo clearly rebukes the justification of war, 
resulting in a clear violation of international law. 
 
The memo goes on to warn all recipients that it should 
remain “secret” to all others in light of the highly 
sensitive.  
 
“This record is extremely sensitive. No further copies 
should be made. It should be shown only to those with a 
genuine need to know its contents,” writes Rycroft to the 
Prime Minister.  
 
He further added that “ The Defense Secretary said that the 
US had already begun "spikes of activity" to put pressure 
on the regime. No decisions had been taken, but he thought 
the most likely timing in US minds for military action to 
begin was January, with the timeline beginning 30 days 
before the US Congressional elections.” 
 
The memo went on to delineate two possible l U.S. war 
strategies, Iraq’s most likely response and Bush’s personal 
awareness of the whole plan.  
 
 
“U.S. military planners are to brief CENTCOM on 1-2 August, 
Rumsfeld on 3 August and Bush on 4 August (2002. The two 
broad US (war) options were: 
 
“ (a) Generated Start. A slow build-up of 250,000 US 
troops, a short (72 hour) air campaign, then a move up to 
Baghdad from the south. Lead time of 90 days (30 days 
preparation plus 60 days deployment to Kuwait). 
 
“ (b) Running Start. Use forces already in theatre (3 x 
6,000), continuous air campaign . Total lead time of 60 
days with the air campaign beginning even earlier. A 
hazardous option.” 
 
Critics of the Bush administration war strategy, claim this 
shows clearly Bush “lied to the American people and should 
be held accountable,” giving a full explanation about the 
contents of the Rycroft memo.

Powered by CityMaker.com