Articles>
Kucinich Again Dances Around 9/11 Truth Issue
Some patriots call him a coward and a shill, others disagree.
8 Feb 2007

By Greg Szymanski

 

Presidential candidate Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) continues to dance around the 9/11 issue like a cowardly  man afraid to confront the truth and a man obviously in the pocket of the Vatican-led New World Order.

 

“He never will confront the real issues, never will talk about the Vatican-Jesuit Order control over our government, never will get to  truth about 9/11 and is a man that shouldn’t be trusted,” said Eric Jon Phelps, author of the book Vatican Assassins when told that Kucinich backed off the 9/11 truth issue, saying “9/11 was a thing of the past.”

 

Kucinich recently issued this statement through one of his top aides to Donna Marsh-O’Conner, a mother who lost her 24-year-old pregnant daughter, killed by falling debris when she exited the South Tower, running for her life.

 

Marsh-O’Conner recently appeared on Greg Szymanski’s international radio show, The Investigative Journal on the Republic Broadcasting Network at www.republicbroadcasting.org, saying Kucinich has turned his back on America, the 9/11 victims and the family members who lost their loved ones.

 

She said for years she held out hope Kucinich was on the side of the people, but was hurt, shocked, angered and completely disillusioned with the Ohio Congressman when she realized he finally turned tail and was running scared from getting at the truth behind 9/11.

 

“He is not getting my vote for President and his response about 9/11 shows he is no different than the rest of people trying to hide the real truth about 9/11,” added Marsh-O’Conner during the RBN radio broadcast. “I no longer have any hope he will America get to the truth.”

 

And Marsh-O’Conner is not the only one disappointed with what appears to be the slick talking Kucinich, who apparently is now talking the talk but not walking the walk.

 

Galen Miechick, a former campaign worker for the Congressman, speculated the powers that be finally "got to Kucinich", forcing him to back-off on opening a new probe into 9/11.

 

 "I don't know why he changed his stance, but I would guess he fears for his life. He is nothing but a coward in my eyes," said the former Kucinich campaign worker. I believe he is nothing but a traitor and I would never support him again because Kucinich has already indicated, through his spokesperson, that the committee that he now chairs will NOT be investigating 9-11!

 

"Right now I am putting my support and energy behind John Buchanan who will be seeking 9/11 truth and running for President under the banner of the Citizens' Candidate Party. I'm helping pull together a core team that believes he can be the next President."

 

Other patriots like Phelps are not as kind as Miechick, saying Kucinich is just another shill of the New World Order and the powerful Vatican, asked to play a deceptive role as the liberal in Congressman fighting against the war, evil and corruption when, in essence, he was put there to placate the America people, making everyone falsely believe that someone in Washington is actually working for the people’s best interests.

 

It is interesting to note after Marsh-O’Conner appeared on The Investigative Journal Kucinich indeed addressed 9/11 in his last few interviews and speeches, saying he will be more than happy to open hearings “if scientific information is provided to him meriting a new investigation.

 

Although to those in denial or oblivious about the real corruption in the entire House and Senate – bar none – Kucinich appears to behind 9/11 truth.

 

But in reality to the millions of more savvy Americans, Kucinich is nothing more than a smart political showman, his statements and the “big if”  designed to deceive and sidestep the real 9/11 issues.

 

“What do you mean if there is scientific evidence,” said one Colorado patriot. “He is a joke, a man bought and paid off by the Vatican, playing his part liker a good Jesuit Order and New World minion. I would never vote for a coward and a traitor like him.

 

“There is plenty of 9/11 evidence indicating the government story is a joke and traitors in our government were involved in the planning and cover-up of 9/11. Kucinich is just dancing around the 9/11 issue and can only go so far. If he tells the truth, he is out. If he tells the truth, he knows he will become another Paul Wellstone. Plain and simple he is a coward.”

 

However, one of Kucinich’s supporters disagreed and sent these emails to the Arctic Beacon:

 

Email 1:

Please update your site to reflect that Dennis has indeed addressed 9/11 in

his last few interviews/speeches, and stated he will be more than happy to

open hearings if scientific information is provided to him.  He acknowledged

that 9/11 is still very pertinent.  He is one of our few hopes to make

positive headway in bringing peace, and I think it is counter-productive to

target him for smears.  Remember, he lost his first run at city councilman

before winning 2 years later.  I expect he learned a lot from his last

campaign and will make a legitimate run this time around as the only true

anti-war candidate.

 

Here are the links:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjwrJnmPgjA

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kALg2VptE-g

 

Email 2:

Do you really believe he is an NWO shill?  Is Cynthia McKinney an NWO shill?

They can't ALL be NWO shills.  The fact Kucinich is accessible to everyday

people speaks volumes to me.  He is a legend in Cleveland where they know as

Mayor he stood up to the power company (I think it is called uni Electric or

something like that) and refused to sell the publicly owned utilities

despite their attempts to intimidate him.

 

At worst he is guilty of being loyal to his party, which in turn plays into

the hands of the NWO.  I will certainly contact his campaign and recommend

he appear on your show, but I certainly hope you treat him respectfully

without making accusations without evidence.  If you have evidence besides

the fact he stood down when he got slaughtered in the primaries of 2004 and

spoke positively for Kerry, I'd like to know what it is.  Again, I think at

worst he is guilty of party loyalty.  What would be the point of him

protesting the war from day 1 and making all kinds of condescending remarks

during the house sessions?  Just to create an illusion of debate?  That is

pretty far fetched.  To me it seems much more realistic that he is well

loved in his home district for his heroic stand versus the power company and

for his messages of peace and pro-environment, and the neocons and NWO just

underestimate his ability to disrupt their plans.  The media has attacked

him as a cut n runner and not supporting the troops but he has stood up to

them and spoken out.  I think those volunteers you quote in your article are

angry with him about how he bowed out in 2004, and sure that was very

upsetting and he should be questioned about that, because I would hate to

see him do that with Hilary or Obama, who are both definitely financed by

NWO forces in 2008.

 

Well, I look forward to your reply and I do read your site regularly and

appreciate your efforts.

 

Greg Szymanski

Powered by CityMaker.com